Comments on: The Structural Unity of the Covenant of Grace http://blog.solagratia.org/2005/12/07/the-structural-unity-of-the-covenant-of-grace/ Dealing with issues in reformed theology. Sun, 14 Mar 2010 10:20:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Robert http://blog.solagratia.org/2005/12/07/the-structural-unity-of-the-covenant-of-grace/#comment-52304 Robert Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:25:11 +0000 http://blog.solagratia.org/?p=43#comment-52304 Hi, Good article, let me see if I can understand; you're saying that all of the covenants, except the Adamic Covenant, is a covenant of grace...kind of like when Paul says in Romans, that being justified by faith has always been the point of the whole thing... Am i on the right track? Hi,
Good article, let me see if I can understand; you’re saying that all of the covenants, except the Adamic Covenant, is a covenant of grace…kind of like when Paul says in Romans, that being justified by faith has always been the point of the whole thing…

Am i on the right track?

]]> By: Seth Huckstead http://blog.solagratia.org/2005/12/07/the-structural-unity-of-the-covenant-of-grace/#comment-61 Seth Huckstead Wed, 07 Dec 2005 18:57:11 +0000 http://blog.solagratia.org/?p=43#comment-61 Thank you for this synopsis. This is timely - for I read this same section in Robertson just last night. His explanation of the covenants, their nature (testament vs. covenant), and how each successive covenant builds on the previous helps me to see the argument behind Covenant Theology. It is much more comprehensible and understandable to me than what I had been taught under Dispensational Theology. I especially appreciate the way he deals with the Adamic Covenant in light of the whole counsel of scripture. While the declaration of the Adamic is not explicit, it is implicit via progressive revelation. Thank you for the post, love the website - at least what I can understand (the philosophical terms fly over this layman's head). Thank you for this synopsis. This is timely - for I read this same section in Robertson just last night.

His explanation of the covenants, their nature (testament vs. covenant), and how each successive covenant builds on the previous helps me to see the argument behind Covenant Theology. It is much more comprehensible and understandable to me than what I had been taught under Dispensational Theology.

I especially appreciate the way he deals with the Adamic Covenant in light of the whole counsel of scripture. While the declaration of the Adamic is not explicit, it is implicit via progressive revelation.

Thank you for the post, love the website - at least what I can understand (the philosophical terms fly over this layman’s head).

]]>