<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On The Shoulders of Giants (II)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.solagratia.org/2006/01/22/on-the-shoulders-of-giants-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.solagratia.org/2006/01/22/on-the-shoulders-of-giants-ii/</link>
	<description>Dealing with issues in reformed theology.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Waddington</title>
		<link>http://blog.solagratia.org/2006/01/22/on-the-shoulders-of-giants-ii/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Waddington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 19:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.solagratia.org/2006/01/22/on-the-shoulders-of-giants-ii/#comment-242</guid>
		<description>I will be answering your question in detail in forthcoming segments of the 
blog series.  However, if you have access to Kuyper's "Principles of Sacred 
Theology," you can see how he allows for "set-asides" at pp. 157-59. 
Perhaps, as I will suggest, this relates to his discussion of the 
subject/object relationship and the differences between the physical and 
spiritual sciences in which the very physical nature of natural science puts 
constraints on human theorizing.  You can find his comments on this at pp. 
89-105.  Hope that helps.

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will be answering your question in detail in forthcoming segments of the<br />
blog series.  However, if you have access to Kuyper&#8217;s &#8220;Principles of Sacred<br />
Theology,&#8221; you can see how he allows for &#8220;set-asides&#8221; at pp. 157-59.<br />
Perhaps, as I will suggest, this relates to his discussion of the<br />
subject/object relationship and the differences between the physical and<br />
spiritual sciences in which the very physical nature of natural science puts<br />
constraints on human theorizing.  You can find his comments on this at pp.<br />
89-105.  Hope that helps.</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmrsunz</title>
		<link>http://blog.solagratia.org/2006/01/22/on-the-shoulders-of-giants-ii/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>dmrsunz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.solagratia.org/2006/01/22/on-the-shoulders-of-giants-ii/#comment-210</guid>
		<description>I don't mean to take your thread on a tangent, but can you point me to a more comprehensive presentation of K2. I'd like to know how Kuyper manages to allow for "set-asides" regarding the Fall as if most human faculties were broken but some were left untouched instead of all being more or less bent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mean to take your thread on a tangent, but can you point me to a more comprehensive presentation of K2. I&#8217;d like to know how Kuyper manages to allow for &#8220;set-asides&#8221; regarding the Fall as if most human faculties were broken but some were left untouched instead of all being more or less bent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
