<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Federal Vision Debate: Historical Precedents in the 19C Anglican Church Part I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.solagratia.org/2007/02/19/the-federal-vision-debate-historical-precedents-in-the-19c-anglican-church-part-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.solagratia.org/2007/02/19/the-federal-vision-debate-historical-precedents-in-the-19c-anglican-church-part-i/</link>
	<description>Dealing with issues in reformed theology.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reformata - A Reformed Blog &#187; The Federal Vision Debate: Historical Precedents in the 19C Anglican Church Part III</title>
		<link>http://blog.solagratia.org/2007/02/19/the-federal-vision-debate-historical-precedents-in-the-19c-anglican-church-part-i/#comment-4337</link>
		<dc:creator>Reformata - A Reformed Blog &#187; The Federal Vision Debate: Historical Precedents in the 19C Anglican Church Part III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.solagratia.org/2007/02/19/the-federal-vision-debate-historical-precedents-in-the-19c-anglican-church-part-i/#comment-4337</guid>
		<description>[...] In our previous two posts (part I and part II), we have been examining the parallels (especially as they relate to the current Federal Vision debate) between contemporary conservative Presbyterianism and 19C Anglicanism by considering the polemical writing of J C Ryle. As we have mentioned, Ryle was a representative of the evangelical wing of the Church of England and he was writing against what he labeled as the ritualistic wing of his church. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In our previous two posts (part I and part II), we have been examining the parallels (especially as they relate to the current Federal Vision debate) between contemporary conservative Presbyterianism and 19C Anglicanism by considering the polemical writing of J C Ryle. As we have mentioned, Ryle was a representative of the evangelical wing of the Church of England and he was writing against what he labeled as the ritualistic wing of his church. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Once More With Feeling &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Other precedents</title>
		<link>http://blog.solagratia.org/2007/02/19/the-federal-vision-debate-historical-precedents-in-the-19c-anglican-church-part-i/#comment-4305</link>
		<dc:creator>Once More With Feeling &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Other precedents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.solagratia.org/2007/02/19/the-federal-vision-debate-historical-precedents-in-the-19c-anglican-church-part-i/#comment-4305</guid>
		<description>[...] This invocation of J. C. Ryle is interesting. However, all you have to do is compare Ryle to John Calvin or Turretin and Pictet, or Zacharias Ursinus, and a much different story is immediately evident. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This invocation of J. C. Ryle is interesting. However, all you have to do is compare Ryle to John Calvin or Turretin and Pictet, or Zacharias Ursinus, and a much different story is immediately evident. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reformata - A Reformed Blog &#187; The Federal Vision Debate: Historical Precedents in the 19C Anglican Church Part II</title>
		<link>http://blog.solagratia.org/2007/02/19/the-federal-vision-debate-historical-precedents-in-the-19c-anglican-church-part-i/#comment-4287</link>
		<dc:creator>Reformata - A Reformed Blog &#187; The Federal Vision Debate: Historical Precedents in the 19C Anglican Church Part II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 06:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.solagratia.org/2007/02/19/the-federal-vision-debate-historical-precedents-in-the-19c-anglican-church-part-i/#comment-4287</guid>
		<description>[...] As we noted in our previous post, the FV debate currently taking place among conservative Presbyterianism seems to have some suggestive parallels with a similar dispute that was waged among 19C Anglicans.[1] One can glean some of these similarities by examining some of the polemical literature written by the various disputants of that era. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As we noted in our previous post, the FV debate currently taking place among conservative Presbyterianism seems to have some suggestive parallels with a similar dispute that was waged among 19C Anglicans.[1] One can glean some of these similarities by examining some of the polemical literature written by the various disputants of that era. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
